Interesting article

[videoholic]

This was a good read from an iraqi soldier.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-598909,00.html

[project86]

Believing that this is not propaganda, I would again say that reports like these have again proven that they are merely brainwashed men that deserve to be set free from this tyrant. I pity these men and woman. America has no intentions of “raping and pillaging” this country. To turn the country into a true republic would be one more step to a better world.

[Unicron!]

All the world is against the attack though.

[videoholic]

That's a crock of shit. Some of the world is against it. Some of the world is for it. Whatever. You are overgeneralizing your views.

[Deadly Hamster]

Most the world -IS- against an attack, even our "Allies" populations hate us.

Yes, but we would kill many of these innocent Iraqi millitants and civilians that have done nothing wrong other then be born into a country controlled by an evil man.

[videoholic]

Once this war begins there is nothing saying they have to fight. They could very easily give up arms or even better attack this evil man.

And there is a huge difference between Most and All. Although I don't even think it's most.

[Deadly Hamster]

So, we should tell them to put their lives on the line by leaving or we will kill them? Not a very fair choice.

[videoholic]

Huh? It's a war.

[Deadly Hamster]

Yes it is a war, but it shouldn't be a war. It doesn't have to be a war. I don't think we should slaughter Iraq when we don't have to.

[Mr. Kennedy]

War yes... but not quite world war...

[videoholic]

You are right. We don't have to go to war. All that terrorist had to do was destroy his chemical and biological stock piles and we wouldn't even have this forum. We'd be going after N. Korea, who btw I think is just playing games. They are just trying to get sanctions lifted.